GP Chapter 5

• Engels
• Middelbare school
• vwo
• Leerjaar 4

Global perspectives year 1

Chapter 5:

Chapter 5

This chapter focusses on reading unseen sources, identifying key points and issues, writing about evidence from an unseen source, and evaluating arguments and perspectives from two sources.

5.1: Reading unseen sources

Read pages 77 - 79 and do the accompanying activities.

5.3: Writing about evidence from an unseen source

Read pages 83 - 85 and do the accompanying activities.

Aspects to address when
assessing evidence

When assessing evidence in Global Perspectives, you are expected to critically evaluate sources and evidence in a structured and reflective way. The main aspects to consider include:

1. Source Reliability

• Authorship: Who is the author? What are their credentials or expertise?
• Publication: Where was the information published (e.g., academic journal, reputable news outlet, blog)?
• Bias and Perspective: Does the source show signs of bias, political stance, or agenda?
• Reputation: Is the source well-regarded and known for accurate, balanced reporting?

2. Currency (Timeliness)

• How recent is the information?
• Is the topic time-sensitive or does it require the most up-to-date data?

When assessing evidence: The main aspects to consider include:

3. Relevance

• Is the evidence directly relevant to the question or issue being addressed?
  
• Does it support or challenge the main argument or hypothesis?
  

4. Accuracy

• Is the information supported by facts or references?
  
• Can the data be cross-checked with other credible sources?
  

5. Representativeness

• Does the evidence represent a broad range of views or just a single opinion?
  
• Is it an outlier or consistent with wider findings?
  

6. Purpose of the Source

• Is the source intended to inform, persuade, entertain, or sell something?
  
• What is the motivation behind the source’s publication?

When assessing evidence: The main aspects to consider include:

7. Context

• What are the cultural, historical, or social contexts in which the evidence was produced?
• Does the context affect how the evidence should be interpreted?

8. Use of Evidence

• How is the evidence used in an argument?
• Is it interpreted fairly or selectively?
• Does it support the claims being made, or is it misrepresented?

9. Counter-evidence

• Is there evidence that contradicts the claim?
• Has this counter-evidence been acknowledged or addressed?

5.4: Evaluating arguments and perspectives from two sources

Read pages 86 - 94 and do the accompanying activities.

p. 89: structuring a response

p. 91: how convincing is an argument

Points to address when
evaluating arguments
and perspectives

When evaluating arguments and perspectives in Cambridge Global Perspec-tives, you are expected to assess how well an argument is constructed and how effectively different viewpoints are presented and supported. Here are the key aspects to consider:

1. Clarity of the Argument

• Is the argument clearly stated?
• Are the main claims and conclusions easy to identify?
• Is there a clear line of reasoning?

2. Logical Structure

• Does the argument follow a logical progression?
• Are the reasons and evidence logically connected to the conclusion?
• Are there any logical fallacies (e.g., slippery slope, straw man, ad hominem)?

3. Use of Evidence

• Is the argument supported by relevant, reliable, and sufficient evidence?
• How well is the evidence integrated into the argument?
• Is there misuse or misinterpretation of evidence?

Key aspects to consider when evaluating arguments and perspectives:

4. Balance and Consideration of Counter-Arguments

Are opposing viewpoints or counter-arguments acknowledged?

Are these opposing perspectives fairly represented and effectively addressed?

5. Bias and Assumptions

• Is the argument affected by personal, cultural, or institutional bias?
• What assumptions underlie the argument?
• Are these assumptions valid and justifiable?

6. Perspective and Context

• What perspective is the argument coming from (e.g., cultural, political, economic)?
• Is the argument sensitive to the global, cultural, or contextual dimensions of the issue?

Key aspects to consider when evaluating arguments and perspectives

7. Strength and Validity

• How strong is the reasoning behind the argument?
• Does the conclusion follow convincingly from the premises?
• Are there weak links or unsupported claims?

8. Implications and Consequences

• What are the implications of accepting or rejecting the argument?
• Are potential consequences considered in the reasoning?

9. Comparative Evaluation

• How does this argument compare with others on the same issue?
• Is it more or less convincing? Why?

10. Personal Reflection and Judgement

• Have you critically reflected on the strengths and weaknesses of the argument?
• Have you formed a reasoned personal judgment based on the evaluation?