News Focus
Lessons inspired by current events

Real or Bot? Who's Really Behind the Comments?

Real or Bot? Who's Really Behind the Comments?

How to test a claim before you share it

1 / 14
volgende
Slide 1: Slide
newEditorNewsPoliticsLower Secondary (Key Stage 3)Upper Secondary (Key Stage 4)Further Education (Key Stage 5)BTEC, GCSE

In deze les zitten 14 slides, met interactieve quizzen en tekstslides.

time-iconLesduur is: 20 min
Dit is niet oké

Introductie

Viral posts have blamed "bots" for surreal comments on Nigel Farage's Facebook page and even for a US election result. Students test these claims against the evidence, sort fact from the unproven and the false, and learn how to check a claim before sharing it. Interactive activities include a drag-and-drop sort, polls and open questions. Best suited to Key Stage 3 to FE citizenship, PSHE, media studies or current affairs lessons, taught live in class. This lesson was created with AI assistance.

Onderdelen in deze les

Real or Bot? Who's Really Behind the Comments?

How to test a claim before you share it

The deck tests two viral claims that blamed "bots": that Ukraine's strikes silenced Russia's bots and cost the Republicans the midterms, and that surreal vegetable comments on Nigel Farage's Facebook page were Reform's bots breaking down. Students sort fact from the unproven and the false, and practise checking a claim before sharing it.

Keeping it balanced: the lesson tests claims that flattered critics of both sides. The data-centre story pleased opponents of MAGA and the AfD; the vegetable story pleased opponents of Reform. Neither party is accused of using bots, and no commenter is named. The Farage post that drew the comments was his argument against a slavery apology, which links to the "Is Sorry Enough?" lesson.

Sources: BBC Verify (23 September and 13 October 2026), BBC News (9 October 2026), The Guardian (13 October 2026). The vegetable comments were reported only by Metro (2 November 2026), so they are treated as unproven throughout. Colours: cabbage green and carrot orange, from the hook. Image credit: Nicole Almendrada / Unsplash

1

Yes

2

No

3

A little

Have you seen or heard this news yet?

Note: An opening show of hands tells the teacher whether students have met the "bots" claims on their own feeds.

Stretch: Ask students who have seen them which app they saw them on, and whether they believed them at the time.

Device-free: Thumbs up, sideways or down for Yes, A little or No.

How do you feel about this news?

Deze slide heeft geen instructies

By the end of this lesson you can...

  • Understand what bots and disinformation are, and how claims about them spread online.

  • Evaluate viral claims about bots by sorting them into fact, unproven and false, using evidence.

Note: The two aims move from understanding the words to judging real claims, so students know they will be making calls on evidence.

Stretch: Ask students to predict which of the claims they have heard will turn out to be false.

Device-free: Students copy the aims onto mini-whiteboards and tick each one off at the end.

Key Info

What?

Viral posts blamed "bots" for surreal Facebook comments and a US election result, but the evidence is thin.

Where?

Nigel Farage's Facebook page, Russian data centres hit by Ukrainian drones, and social media feeds in the UK and USA.

Who?

Reform leader Nigel Farage, Ukraine's President Zelensky, fact-checkers at BBC Verify, and millions of social media users.

Note: The three prompts set out the basic facts before any judgement, so the sorting task later rests on shared ground.

Stretch: Students explain why a claim about "bots" is hard for an ordinary user to check.

Device-free: In pairs, students sum up What, Where and Who in a single sentence. Image credit: Emilipothèse / Unsplash Image credit: Winston Chen / Unsplash Image credit: Laurie Noble / UK Parliament, CC BY 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Background

In October, Ukraine struck three Russian data centres. Viral charts claimed Russia's bots had gone silent, and some posts later linked this to the Republicans' midterm defeat.

BBC Verify found the charts showed search-engine crawlers, not fake accounts.

Then surreal vegetable comments flooded Nigel Farage's Facebook page. Some called it broken bots; one expert says a deliberate prank is likelier.

Note: Zelensky said there was "less hate, less division" online because of "fewer bots"; his office later told BBC Verify he meant the general mood on social media, not a measured fall in bots.

Stretch: The Cloudflare charts counted every automated web request, including search engines indexing websites. Ask students why the word "bot" misled so many people.

Device-free: Quick chat in pairs: which claim would you have shared before reading this, and why?

The "one expert" is Pieter Arntz of the cybersecurity firm Malwarebytes, quoted by Metro. He gave four possible explanations and thought deliberate flooding, to make the page look bot-infested, the most likely. Image credit: Office of the President of Ukraine (president.gov.ua), CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

The Big Controversy

Real threat: BBC Verify has tracked Russia-linked fake-account campaigns for more than a decade, and TikTok once removed over 12,000 fake accounts in one operation.

Easy excuse: "it was bots" can also explain away results and opinions people dislike, without checking the evidence.

And: both viral claims in this lesson were welcome news to critics of the side they blamed.

Is blaming bots a warning we need to hear, or an excuse to ignore people we disagree with?

Note: Both sides of the tension are true at once, which is the point: fake accounts exist, and "bots" is also an easy label. Reveal the question with a click and give pairs a minute to pick a side.

Stretch: Students think of a time they assumed a comment was fake because they disagreed with it.

Device-free: An agree–disagree line across the room in response to the question. Image credit: Berke Citak / Unsplash

Fact, unproven or false? Drag each claim to its box.

Fact, unproven or false?

Fact

Unproven

False / not supported

The vegetable comments on Farage's page were Reform's bots breaking down.

The strikes knocked out Russia's bots and cost the Republicans the midterms.

Ukraine struck Russian data centres in October.

Note: Fact: Ukraine hit three of Yandex's five data centres between 8 and 11 October (BBC, 9 October). Unproven: the vegetable comments are real, but nobody has shown who wrote them. False / not supported: BBC Verify and the Guardian found no drop in Russian bot networks, and no reputable outlet links the strikes to the midterm result.

Stretch: Ask what evidence would move the "unproven" claim into one of the other boxes.

Device-free: Read each claim aloud; students hold up one, two or three fingers for Fact, Unproven or False.

1

Broken bots

2

A prank

3

Real supporters

4

Can't tell yet

Who do you think wrote the vegetable comments?

Note: There is no confirmed answer, so "Can't tell yet" is a perfectly good choice; the vote shows how ready the class is to jump to a conclusion.

Stretch: Ask students who chose "A prank" who might gain from making a page look full of bots.

Device-free: Students move to four corners of the room, one for each option.

Explain your answer from the poll

Note: Turning a vote into a written reason pushes students to name the evidence behind their guess.

Stretch: Students add what they would need to see to change their mind.

Device-free: Each student writes one sentence on a mini-whiteboard and swaps with a partner.

What would you check before sharing a post that blames bots?

Note: This turns the lesson into a habit students can use on their own feeds.

Stretch: Points to look for: who is making the claim and what they gain; what the data actually measures (the Cloudflare "bots" were web crawlers); whether fact-checkers such as BBC Verify have looked at it; signs of a fake account (new account, no real photo, posting all day); and whether you want it to be true.

Device-free: Build a five-point checklist on the board from quick calls around the class.

Key Concepts

Bot — software that does tasks automatically; online it can mean a fake account run by a computer, or a program that indexes websites for search engines.

Disinformation — false information spread on purpose to mislead people.

Misinformation — false information shared by people who believe it is true.

Fact-check — testing a claim against evidence before you accept or share it.

Note: The difference between disinformation and misinformation matters here: a person who shares a false chart in good faith is spreading misinformation, not disinformation.

Stretch: Students decide which of the two words fits the viral data-centre charts, and why.

Device-free: The teacher reads a definition and students call out the matching term.

What question do you have about this news?

Note: A closing open question checks what students have taken away and shows where understanding is still thin.

Stretch: Ask students where they would look for a reliable answer to their question.

Device-free: Students write their question on a sticky note on the way out.

News Focus lessons - short lessons on current events

Deze slide heeft geen instructies