Modern Lit Activity 2
Collaborative annotating, argument mapping, and structured debate
Modern Lit Activity 2
Collaborative annotating, argument mapping, and structured debate
Learning Objectives
After this session, you will be able to:
Critically analyze Kingston’s use of memoir, myth, and speculation
Evaluate ethical questions surrounding narrative authority
Apply theoretical concepts to close textual reading
Engage in structured academic debate using textual evidence
Context
Why Is The Woman Warrior Controversial?
Blurs boundaries between memoir and fiction
Invents stories for historically silenced women
Raises ethical questions about voice and representation
Has been both praised and criticized by scholars
Central Question
Is Maxine Hong Kingston ethically justified in fictionalising her aunt’s story?
What does it mean to “give voice”?
Who has the right to tell a story?
When does storytelling become ethical risk?
For this activiy we are using "No Name Woman" and "White Tigers" , specifically focusing on speculation and imagination, silence and enforced absence, and myth as narrative strategy
Preparation before class
https://app.perusall.com/join/NIJSINK-NJ4TF
What you did:
Annotated key passages
Identified moments of speculation
Tagged themes (voice, silence, ethics)
Moving from Interpretation to Evaluation
Annotations reveal multiple readings, points of tension and ethical ambiguity
Today we build arguments from these insights
Collaborative argument mapping Padlet
Link to Padlet: https://padlet.com/rachelnijsink/the-woman-warrior-collaborative-argument-mapping-rf922if31trrxwi3
Padlet Board Sections:
Textual Evidence
Theoretical Lens
Ethical Justification
Ethical Risk / Critique
Your task:
Add evidence-based contributions
Respond to existing posts
Make theoretical reasoning explicit
Structured debate
Based on your arguments you will fill in the Mentimeter:https://www.menti.com/alzhhgx35nja
Is Kingston ethically justified in fictionalizing her aunt’s story?
Group A – Defense
Storytelling as feminist recovery
Giving voice to silenced women
Group B – Critique
Ethical risks of appropriation
Overwriting silence with authorial voice
Rules:
Cite the text
Use theory
Respond to counterarguments
Reflection
Did this debate change your view of Kingston’s narrative authority? Why or why not?